Bhopal
gas tragedy victims by a US Court to blow the Court said that. chemical
damage to the environment caused by the accident at the plant or
pollution claims linked to Union Carbide Chairman Warren Anderson or her
ex responsible. the company Union Carbide India Ltd India
responsibility [UCIL]. on the night of 2-3 December 1984 gas leak in
Bhopal to be by far the largest industrial accident considered Indian
history .
Manhattan
district judge dismissed the lawsuit by John kina that tragedy of
Bhopal plant to soil and water pollution around the Union Carbide were
attributed to the parent company, said the Court was Union Carbide
Corporation [UCC] and associated with environmental pollution damage or
Anderson's claims are not liable to compensate the production and
execution of the garbage to UCIL. responsible drinking water polluted
after the parent company of responsibility. UCC 's. so that liability of the Madhya Pradesh Government.
Petitioner
janki Bai Sahu and other poisonous substances into groundwater, said
the spread of contaminated drinking water around the plant in Bhopal.
the decision states that there is no evidence that these are indications
that UCIL pesticide used to build such contract or UCC or UCC called
she. decisions that directly responsible the UCC. As
a responsible agent of UCIL. Court decisions of a court relating to the
1998 KFC, stating that merely mention it to your company from the
corporate subsidiaries involved in decision making process or its
policies was it his accountability controls.
The
Court found that the Government of India in 1984, the year after the
tragedy Bhopal plant closed in 1994 to its stake in UCIL. UCC sold in
1998 followed by UCIL. renamed everyday industries India Ltd. The MP Government. the company and its surrounding property of the Bhopal plant with its lease over to us.
